<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DELL Equallogic VS Fiber Channel SAN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-vs-fiber-channel-san/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-vs-fiber-channel-san/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 14:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lund</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-vs-fiber-channel-san/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=580#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Great article, we are currently looking at both San technologies, thanks for the additional information and comparison.

 I have some more vendor information on the Equallogic San on my blog

Roger Lund

http://rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, we are currently looking at both San technologies, thanks for the additional information and comparison.</p>
<p> I have some more vendor information on the Equallogic San on my blog</p>
<p>Roger Lund</p>
<p><a href="http://rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-vs-fiber-channel-san/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=580#comment-322</guid>
		<description>gigabit ISCSI, my FC is 2 x dual port HBA, my ISCSI is 3 Physical Virtual NIC and ESX VMkernel with 3 physical NIC teaming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gigabit ISCSI, my FC is 2 x dual port HBA, my ISCSI is 3 Physical Virtual NIC and ESX VMkernel with 3 physical NIC teaming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmkoko</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-vs-fiber-channel-san/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>vmkoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=580#comment-321</guid>
		<description>140MB/s vs 115MB/s........ How many FC ports (FC2 or FC4) compare with iSCSI ports (1 GbE)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>140MB/s vs 115MB/s&#8230;&#8230;.. How many FC ports (FC2 or FC4) compare with iSCSI ports (1 GbE)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.304 seconds -->

