<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; Netapp Metrocluster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netapp-metrocluster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ESX Cluster through WAN with Netapp Metro Cluster</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/esx-wan-netapp/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/esx-wan-netapp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netapp Metrocluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently there are some request from my client who suggested to have their production and DR site to be automated protected and fail over in the event of disaster. VMware SRM seems to be right choice for most of the time, but these clients are decided to bring it to another level of fail over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently there are some request from my client who suggested to have their production and DR site to be automated protected and fail over in the event of disaster. VMware SRM seems to be right choice for most of the time, but these clients are decided to bring it to another level of fail over procedure during the DR happen. I am doing some research today and found this interesting topic from Netapp which the Metro cluster suppose to synchronize from production to DR through dark fiber to prevent controller failure, DR or disk corruption.</p>
<p><span id="more-1644"></span>If the bandwidth is not a concern in this case, ESX HA cluster through both data center is workable with Netapp metro cluster. In the event of disaster happen, the VM should be restarted as the normal HA kick in from the ESX cluster.</p>
<p>you can read more information from the link <a href="http://blogs.netapp.com/virtualization/2009/04/metrocluster-in-the-cloud.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/esx-wan-netapp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.495 seconds -->

