<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; RDM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/rdm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Cluster with Windows 2008 R2 on VMware</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/microsoft-cluster-with-windows-2008-r2-on-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/microsoft-cluster-with-windows-2008-r2-on-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=2070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just did some test today on building the Windows 2008 R2 Cluster on top of VMware vSphere 4.1. This is my 1st time to configure a Microsoft cluster with windows 2008R2. Read through some best practices guide from VMWare and configure it.  Couple of key things you may wanna take note while building a Microsoft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just did some test today on building the Windows 2008 R2 Cluster on top of VMware vSphere 4.1. This is my 1st time to configure a <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/microsoft">Microsoft</a> cluster with windows 2008R2. Read through some best practices guide from VMWare and configure it.  Couple of key things you may wanna take note while building a Microsoft cluster on VMware.</p>
<p>1st is the placement for the 2 node cluster virtual machine, which you should consider split the 2 virtual machine in different host and disable the DRS or <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmotion">vMotion</a> for the cluster node. Now is about the quorum disk and data disk you would like to put in the cluster. You may consider using RDM for either physical or virtual mode, and provide separate SCSI controller for the share disk. You will further require configure the SCSI controller as physical mode allow the RDM to be access by the 2nd node later.</p>
<p><span id="more-2070"></span>You may not able to add the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/rdm">RDM</a> to the 2nd node as you usually did in this case. You will need to browse through the existing virtual disk, to point it to the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmdk">vmdk</a> configuration files which own the RDM path from the virtual machine folders.  Once you have done this, you can configure your Microsoft cluster as usual. Not complicated, it just few important steps you need to take note here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/microsoft-cluster-with-windows-2008-r2-on-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offline VM Migration auto convert RDM to VMDK format</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/offline-vm-migration-auto-convert-rdm-to-vmdk-format/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/offline-vm-migration-auto-convert-rdm-to-vmdk-format/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to some reconfiguration work we performed on our Virtual Infrastructure, we had required to relocate some of the VM to a different datastore. These VMs which required to be moved had been attached with Raw Device Mapping (RDM). Previously I thought the offline storage migration will not move the RDM over to the datastore [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to some reconfiguration work we performed on our Virtual Infrastructure, we had required to relocate some of the VM to a different datastore. These VMs which required to be moved had been attached with Raw Device Mapping (<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/rdm">RDM</a>). Previously I thought the offline storage migration will not move the RDM over to the datastore as RDM is referring to the raw device from the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/san">SAN</a> storage.Actually I was planned to convert the RDM to <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmdk">VMDK</a> which I planned to manual transfer the files I need from RDM to the new virtual disk I created.</p>
<p><span id="more-1202"></span><br />
In a test yesterday, we found that a offline <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a> migration will auto convert the RDM which attach to the virtual machine to the VMDK format when I selected the data store to be moved in offline mode. This was really surprise myself and simplify my work actually, as I do not require some manual file transfer from the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/rdm">RDM</a> to the new virtual disk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/offline-vm-migration-auto-convert-rdm-to-vmdk-format/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESX and VM Guest &#8211; Round Robin Storage Setting</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/esx-and-vm-guest-round-robin-storage-setting/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/esx-and-vm-guest-round-robin-storage-setting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round Robin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To improve the I/O performance for ESX Virtual Infrastructure, VMware had come out with the round robin option for both ESX and VM guests. Although is an experimental option in the ESX setting today, but I will encourage you all to try this option which provide fail over and load balancing on the storage path [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To improve the I/O performance for ESX Virtual Infrastructure, VMware had come out with the round robin option for both ESX and VM guests. Although is an experimental option in the ESX setting today, but I will encourage you all to try this option which provide fail over and load balancing on the storage path to connect to you SAN storage. For VM guests, you will allow allow to use this when you have RDM &#8211; Raw Device Mapping option to direct read write to the physical LUN from your SAN storage without using VMFS.</p>
<p><span id="more-120"></span></p>
<p>To enable this on ESX host, you need to browse to the configuration tab of the ESX host, and right click the data store and select properties, and click on manage paths option in the GUI wizard. Click on Change button after that, and choose the Round Robin (Experimental) option and click OK. You will need to go through this process 1 by 1 to ensure you had round robin from each ESX host to each of the VMFS Data store.</p>
<p>For VM Guests, Just right click the VM and choose edit setting, and select to the hard disk which has shown as Mapped Raw LUN on the summary tab. Click on the Manage Paths and follow by the change button, and same you can easily configure to have the Round Robin enable.</p>
<p><strong>ESX Host Configuuration</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/roundrobin-1.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p>Wizard View for each Data Store connection from ESX</p>
<p><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/roundrobin-2.JPG" alt="Round Robin" /></p>
<p>Policy Option which allow to change for Round Robin</p>
<p><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/roundrobin-3.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p>Select the option of Round Robin</p>
<p><strong>VM Guests Configuration</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/roundrobin-4.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p>Click on Manage Paths to continue with the Round Robin Option in the next screen</p>
<p><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/roundrobin-5.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/roundrobin-3.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p>You will actually see the same display and option at the last 2 steps compare the VM guests and ESX Host</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/esx-and-vm-guest-round-robin-storage-setting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware VMFS Vs RDM ( Raw Device Mapping )</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Device Mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I had read a couple of article regarding the performance caparison chart from VMware, Netapps and some of the forum communities, I do really find out the real performance is much different with the technical white paper that I read before this. As for the today, more users are actually deployed the mission critical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I had read a couple of article regarding the performance caparison chart from <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a>, Netapps and some of the forum communities, I do really find out the real performance is much different with the technical white paper that I read before this.</p>
<p>As for the today, more users are actually deployed the mission critical and high I/O servers on the virtualization environment, but we do see some I/O bottle neck which cause by the storage performance always. <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmdk">VMDK</a> do provide flexibility from management perspective, but it does sacrifice the performance you may require for your databases, files transfers and disk performance. I had run a couple of test with real case scenerio instead of I/O meter that been always use widely, and here is the summarize result I would like to share.</p>
<p>In disk perfomance, we always split it to 2 categories as sequential and random I/O. in sequential mode, you will see the huge different while you try to perform the file transfer locally or through network. My test environment is running with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/san">SAN</a> storage from fiber channel with same LUN size and raid group which are created from the Storage Level. The only differences is <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmfs">VMFS</a> Vs <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/raw">Raw</a>.</p>
<p>Raid Group design 7+1 raid 5 configuration and run on MetaLun configuration</p>
<p>Each LUN size is 300GB<br />
<span id="more-23"></span><br />
Performance monitoring tools = Virtual Center Performance Chart</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a> Test Machine = 4 Vcpu, 8GB Memory</p>
<p>Operating System = SLES 10 x32, x64 ; <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> Server 2003 x32, x64</p>
<p>Sequential : <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/rdm">RDM</a> is out perform VS VMFS as it able to achieve &gt; 2 times higher through put during the file transfer locally on the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">VM</span></p>
<p><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">Random I/O : The Raw Device Mapping is still out perform the VMFS and getting the similar through put with sequential file transfer. Multi session with random database query is been executed in the test</span></p>
<p>for <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/nfs">NFS</a> file transfer from VMFS to VMFS, I do see the bottle neck happen much more earlier than RDM.</p>
<p>Highest I/O rate for RDM = 180MB/s as during sequential files copy and DB query</p>
<p>Highest I/O rate for VMDK = 100MB/s during sequential files copy and DB query</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.636 seconds -->

