<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; sata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/sata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DELL Equallogic PS5500E Auto Snapshot Manager</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-ps5500e-provide-auto-snapshot-manager-for-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-ps5500e-provide-auto-snapshot-manager-for-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10Ge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equallogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS5500E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapshot Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest version of ISCSI SAN Equallogic PS 5500E which launched recently had provide better capacity, performance, extra functionalities and more spindles in arrays. It could be support both 500GB and 1TB SATA II spindles up to 48 drives in a single array of 4U. A very impress usable storage space in single array which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest version of ISCSI SAN Equallogic PS 5500E which launched recently had provide better capacity, performance, extra functionalities and more spindles in arrays. It could be support both 500GB and 1TB <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/sata">SATA</a> II spindles up to 48 drives in a single array of 4U. A very impress usable storage space in single array which up to 48TB in <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/raw">raw</a>. If we compare to the capacity, it is hardly found that a single array would provide a huge capacity at 48TB in Raw today. In additional to that, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/dell">DELL</a> had provide all the necessary features as for storage management as free which integrated as part of the storage purchase for Dell Equallogic <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/iscsi">ISCSI</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/san">SAN</a>. The latest features is regarding the Snapshot Manager for VMware. Previous version is only supported on Microsoft environment, but now, it had also supported on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMWare</a> environment.</p>
<p><span id="more-563"></span></p>
<p>This features provide more option which will allow the users to snapshot, backup, and restore the files, volume, VM or even a single file that you need. Many of us may think about using the VCB for our VM backup today, the Dell <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/equalogic">Equallogic</a> had provide some interesting package which allow us to avoid of <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcb">VCB</a> in our environment, and provide better backup and restoration process.</p>
<p>If we talk about disk base backup, which is VTL, it always cost involve in term of disk space and software licenses. With the latest features from <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/equallogic">Equallogic</a>, we will able to avoid the extra investment require on VTL, but provide the similar functionalities on disk base backup, and from disk to tape backup. If I bought the equallogic previously and sign up with the maintenance, I entitle the upgrade of the new features today. It will be a excellent surprise for my investment. As economy crisis, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/it">IT</a> budget is been tight and require to work smarter, this should be a great news for the consumers. Personally, I will still say that the 10Gbe will be my option as to get rid of the fiber channel storage that we current use for <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a>. As 48 spindles in a single array, we may need the bigger through put from the array to reach the client always.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/dell">DELL</a>, we should able to see the official launch on 10Gbe on 1st quater of 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/dell-equallogic-ps5500e-provide-auto-snapshot-manager-for-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Vcpu per VM &#8211; VMware is behind the competitor</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/8-vcpu-per-vm-vmware-is-behind-the-competitor/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/8-vcpu-per-vm-vmware-is-behind-the-competitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vcpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xensource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had just setup a brand new Citrix Xensource hypervisor server today for evaluation purpose. The really impress thing that attracted myself is the 8Vcpu per VM be able to configure which over take ESX servers 3.5 update 2 today. I know that VMware has their roadmap in the future to release the 8vcpu to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had just setup a brand new <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/citrix">Citrix</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xensource">Xensource</a> hypervisor server today for evaluation purpose. The really impress thing that attracted myself is the 8Vcpu per VM be able to configure which over take ESX servers 3.5 update 2 today. I know that VMware has their roadmap in the future to release the 8vcpu to support processing power hungry application to be virtualized in the future.</p>
<p>But if we compare the technology today, I believe most of us will see that from virtual cpu perspective, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> had been quite slow respond on that. If you do spoke to most of the VMware representative or consultant, they always told you not to allocate more than 1 Vcpu if not required.</p>
<p><span id="more-384"></span></p>
<p>In real world, I believe that non of us will be satisfied with the single core performance for our server environment. Dual core is been in the market for more than 2 years, and quad core had been also popularize to most of us. Single core will just be SLOW in most of the event. I am here to urge VMware to push harder for more virtual <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu">CPU</a> per VM. The thing that should consider is to compare with the competitor products like Xen and <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xensource">Xensource</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_01.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-384];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_01.png" alt="Xen Server" width="517" height="270" /></a></p>
<p>In Xen, you will allow to configure 8 vcpu per VM if your host have 8 cores. That meant you should able to configure 16 cores per VM if your host do have 4 x quad cores today. I am yet to test with 16 cores per VM as my machine is come with 2 x <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/quad">quad</a> cores.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_02.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-384];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_02.png" alt="Xen Server" width="518" height="270" /></a></p>
<p>I even try to run a VM with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> 2008 which contains 8GB memory and 8 virtual cpu assign. The VM is run on local storage on the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/sata">SATA</a> disk. The performance on the VM is just fast compare to 4 vcpu VM I had in <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a>. Again, not to say VMware is not good, and I strongly believe VMware is still the best today, but they are little behind with the delay of more vcpu per VM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/8-vcpu-per-vm-vmware-is-behind-the-competitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.375 seconds -->

