<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; vcpu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMware vSphere 4 update 1</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-update-1/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-update-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vcpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vsphere 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=1648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware had officially released the vSphere 4 update 1 yesterday. There are many new support features and also bug fixes. Is time to take a look for a major upgrade this month to overcome some challenges we faced with the previous version. Please view more information from the release note. Beside the bug fixes, there [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/long-distance-vmotion-on-vmware-vsphere-4/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Long Distance VMotion on VMware vSphere 4'>Long Distance VMotion on VMware vSphere 4</a></li>
<li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/srm-4-is-ready-for-vmware-vsphere-4/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SRM 4 is ready for VMware vSphere 4'>SRM 4 is ready for VMware vSphere 4</a></li>
<li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-performance-troubleshooting-guide/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: VMware vSphere 4 Performance Troubleshooting Guide'>VMware vSphere 4 Performance Troubleshooting Guide</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware had officially released the <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vsphere">vSphere</a> 4 update 1 yesterday. There are many new support features and also bug fixes. Is time to take a look for a major upgrade this month to overcome some challenges we faced with the previous version.</p>
<p>Please view more information from the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vsphere4/doc/vsp_vc40_u1_rel_notes.html">release note</a>.</p>
<p>Beside the <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/bug">bug</a> fixes, there are some new key highlight here too.</p>
<p><span id="more-1648"></span><strong>VMware View 4.0 support</strong> <strong>–</strong> This release adds support for VMware View 4.0, a solution built specifically for delivering desktops as a managed service from the protocol to the platform.</p>
<p><strong>Windows 7 and Windows 2008 R2 support –</strong>Officially Supported both windows 7 and 2008 R2 for 32 bits and 64 bits. The previous issue for the viclient that could not run on <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows7">Windows 7</a> had been solved</p>
<p><strong>Enhanced Clustering Support for Microsoft Windows –</strong> <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/microsoft">Microsoft</a> Cluster Server (MSCS) for Windows 2000 and 2003 and Windows Server 2008 Failover Clustering is now supported on an  (HA) and (DRS) cluster in a limited configuration.</p>
<p><strong>Enhanced VMware Paravirtualized SCSI Support</strong><strong> –</strong> Support for boot disk devices attached to a Paravirtualized SCSI ( PVSCSI) adapter has been added for Windows 2003 and 2008 guest operating systems</p>
<p><strong>Improved vNetwork Distributed <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/switch">Switch</a>  Performance </strong><strong>–</strong> Several performance and usability issues have been resolved resulting in the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Improved performance when making configuration changes to a vNetwork Distributed Switch (vDS) instance when the ESX/ESXi host is under a heavy load</li>
<li>Improved performance when adding or removing an ESX/ESXi host to or from a vDS instance</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Increase <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu">vCPU</a> per Core Limit</strong> <strong>–</strong> The limit on vCPUs per core has been increased from 20 to 25. This change raises the supported limit only. It does not include any additional performance optimizations.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/long-distance-vmotion-on-vmware-vsphere-4/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Long Distance VMotion on VMware vSphere 4'>Long Distance VMotion on VMware vSphere 4</a></li>
<li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/srm-4-is-ready-for-vmware-vsphere-4/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SRM 4 is ready for VMware vSphere 4'>SRM 4 is ready for VMware vSphere 4</a></li>
<li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-performance-troubleshooting-guide/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: VMware vSphere 4 Performance Troubleshooting Guide'>VMware vSphere 4 Performance Troubleshooting Guide</a></li>
</ol></p>
	Tags: <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu/" title="vcpu" rel="tag">vcpu</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vds/" title="vDS" rel="tag">vDS</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware/" title="VMware" rel="tag">VMware</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vsphere-4/" title="vsphere 4" rel="tag">vsphere 4</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-update-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual CPU Increase on Demand in vSphere</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/virtual-cpu-increase-on-demand-in-vsphere/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/virtual-cpu-increase-on-demand-in-vsphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vcpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vSphere will match with the competitor hypervisor to deliver up to 8 vCpu per VM. This will increase the CPU resources to VM guest which may require more than 4 vcpu previously. At the same time, it also provide the flexibility to support multiple vcpu from 1 to 8. Configure 5 Vcpu for the VM [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/screen-shot-vmware-vsphere-4-on-latest-cisco-ucs/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Screen Shot &#8211; VMware vSphere 4 on Latest Cisco UCS'>Screen Shot &#8211; VMware vSphere 4 on Latest Cisco UCS</a></li>
<li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-update-1/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: VMware vSphere 4 update 1'>VMware vSphere 4 update 1</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vsphere">vSphere</a> will match with the competitor hypervisor to deliver up to 8 <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu">vCpu</a> per VM. This will increase the CPU resources to VM guest which may require more than 4 vcpu previously. At the same time, it also provide the flexibility to support multiple vcpu from 1 to 8.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vsphere/vsphere08.JPG" rel="shadowbox[post-1032];player=img;"><img src="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vsphere/vsphere08.JPG" alt="" width="499" height="203" rel="shadowbox" /></a></p>
<p>Configure 5 Vcpu for the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a></p>
<p><span id="more-1032"></span><a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vsphere/vsphere09.JPG" rel="shadowbox[post-1032];player=img;"><img src="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vsphere/vsphere09.JPG" alt="" width="500" height="374" rel="shadowbox" /></a></p>
<p>Task Manager in <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> show 5 cores are active</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vsphere/vsphere14.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-1032];player=img;"><img src="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vsphere/vsphere14.jpg" alt="" width="498" height="204" rel="shadowbox" /></a></p>
<p>Summary Tab shows 5 vcpu had been assigned. In physical Server environment, we will usually start with 1 cpu, 2 cpus, 4 cpus, 8 cpus and etc. This features from vmware vSphere is really helpful and allow us to control and prevent over provision to the virtual Machine</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/screen-shot-vmware-vsphere-4-on-latest-cisco-ucs/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Screen Shot &#8211; VMware vSphere 4 on Latest Cisco UCS'>Screen Shot &#8211; VMware vSphere 4 on Latest Cisco UCS</a></li>
<li><a href='http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vsphere-4-update-1/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: VMware vSphere 4 update 1'>VMware vSphere 4 update 1</a></li>
</ol></p>
	Tags: <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu/" title="vcpu" rel="tag">vcpu</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm/" title="VM" rel="tag">VM</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware/" title="VMware" rel="tag">VMware</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vsphere/" title="vSphere" rel="tag">vSphere</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/virtual-cpu-increase-on-demand-in-vsphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maximum numbers of Vcpu in single ESX Host</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/maximum-numbers-of-vcpu-in-single-esx-host/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/maximum-numbers-of-vcpu-in-single-esx-host/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vcpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we refer to the current version which is ESX 3.5 u3, the maximum number of Vcpu per ESX server is 192 per ESX Servers. Personally, I think the number of Vcpu per ESX servers is too minimal. Imagine if we do run a servers with 4 or 8 physical CPU sockets and we consolidate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we refer to the current version which is <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> 3.5 u3, the maximum number of Vcpu per ESX server is 192 per ESX Servers. Personally, I think the number of Vcpu per ESX servers is too minimal. Imagine if we do run a servers with 4 or 8 physical CPU sockets and we consolidate 40 : 1 Physical <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">server</a> in our virtualization environment, we will hit to the bottleneck on maximum numbers of Vcpu per ESX servers but not due to the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu">CPU</a> consumption.I hope VMWare should revise the configuration to greater number or 256 Vcpu per ESX servers.</p>
<p><span id="more-916"></span></p>
<p>The reason of virtualizing today, is really not about sacrifice performance. In our environment, we have most VMs running with 4 Vcpu as the result of customer compare VM to Physical Servers to ensure the performance is sustainable or improve when they switch to <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a>. When the VM itself is idle or less busy, it will not consume too much resources on the Physical CPU cores. Next release of ESX will go for 8Vcpu per VM. The number of Vcpu been assigned to the VMs which require extra <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu">CPU</a> resources will increase too.</p>
<p><strong>Updated:</strong> <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi3_35/esx_3/r35u2/vi3_35_25_u2_config_max.pdf">Configuration Maximums for VMware Infrastructure 3</a> &#8211; Number of Virtual CPU = 192</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu/" title="CPU" rel="tag">CPU</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx/" title="ESX" rel="tag">ESX</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/processors/" title="Processors" rel="tag">Processors</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu/" title="vcpu" rel="tag">vcpu</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/virtualization/" title="Virtualization" rel="tag">Virtualization</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware/" title="VMware" rel="tag">VMware</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/maximum-numbers-of-vcpu-in-single-esx-host/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Vcpu per VM &#8211; VMware is behind the competitor</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/8-vcpu-per-vm-vmware-is-behind-the-competitor/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/8-vcpu-per-vm-vmware-is-behind-the-competitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vcpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xensource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had just setup a brand new Citrix Xensource hypervisor server today for evaluation purpose. The really impress thing that attracted myself is the 8Vcpu per VM be able to configure which over take ESX servers 3.5 update 2 today. I know that VMware has their roadmap in the future to release the 8vcpu to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had just setup a brand new <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/citrix">Citrix</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xensource">Xensource</a> hypervisor server today for evaluation purpose. The really impress thing that attracted myself is the 8Vcpu per VM be able to configure which over take ESX servers 3.5 update 2 today. I know that VMware has their roadmap in the future to release the 8vcpu to support processing power hungry application to be virtualized in the future.</p>
<p>But if we compare the technology today, I believe most of us will see that from virtual cpu perspective, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> had been quite slow respond on that. If you do spoke to most of the VMware representative or consultant, they always told you not to allocate more than 1 Vcpu if not required.</p>
<p><span id="more-384"></span></p>
<p>In real world, I believe that non of us will be satisfied with the single core performance for our server environment. Dual core is been in the market for more than 2 years, and quad core had been also popularize to most of us. Single core will just be SLOW in most of the event. I am here to urge VMware to push harder for more virtual <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu">CPU</a> per VM. The thing that should consider is to compare with the competitor products like Xen and <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xensource">Xensource</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_01.png" rel="shadowbox[post-384];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_01.png" alt="Xen Server" width="517" height="270" /></a></p>
<p>In Xen, you will allow to configure 8 vcpu per VM if your host have 8 cores. That meant you should able to configure 16 cores per VM if your host do have 4 x quad cores today. I am yet to test with 16 cores per VM as my machine is come with 2 x <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/quad">quad</a> cores.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_02.png" rel="shadowbox[post-384];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/xen8cpu_02.png" alt="Xen Server" width="518" height="270" /></a></p>
<p>I even try to run a VM with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> 2008 which contains 8GB memory and 8 virtual cpu assign. The VM is run on local storage on the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/sata">SATA</a> disk. The performance on the VM is just fast compare to 4 vcpu VM I had in <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a>. Again, not to say VMware is not good, and I strongly believe VMware is still the best today, but they are little behind with the delay of more vcpu per VM.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx/" title="ESX" rel="tag">ESX</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/quad-cores/" title="quad cores" rel="tag">quad cores</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/sata/" title="sata" rel="tag">sata</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu/" title="vcpu" rel="tag">vcpu</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware/" title="VMware" rel="tag">VMware</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows-2008/" title="Windows 2008" rel="tag">Windows 2008</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xen/" title="Xen" rel="tag">Xen</a>, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xensource/" title="Xensource" rel="tag">Xensource</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/8-vcpu-per-vm-vmware-is-behind-the-competitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.483 seconds -->
