<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; VMware Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Beta on VMware Server 2</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/windows-7-beta-on-vmware-server-2/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/windows-7-beta-on-vmware-server-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windos 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I had fully tested the installation and functionalities for the latest Windows 7 on my VMware Server 2.0. The OS choice I choose from the VMware Server is Vista as for compatible to run the Windows 7. Impressively the performance is much more better than the Vista before. The installation had went through as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I had fully tested the installation and functionalities for the latest Windows 7 on my VMware Server 2.0. The OS choice I choose from the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> Server is <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vista">Vista</a> as for compatible to run the Windows 7. Impressively the performance is much more better than the Vista before. The installation had went through as usual as I do not run into drivers issues during and after the installation for Windows 7. Now I am enjoying the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows7">Windows 7</a> on VM with good performance compare to my Vista which always give me troublesome with unknown error.</p>
<p><span id="more-769"></span></p>
<p>The only difficulty I have now is Daemon Tools, which use for <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/iso">ISO</a> purpose. Beside that, I am using it as my day to day operational purpose including Microsoft <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/office">Office</a>, firefox, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/ie">IE</a> 8, Live messenger and etc. Respond wise had been significant improve as compare to Vista previously.</p>
<p>I am not installed my Workstation to <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows7">Windows 7</a> 64 bits Ultimate version and use in full mode for my office work. I would like to say I am happy on it. If you want to have a try on this, you will always able to install the windows 7 on both VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a> and VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a>. Have fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/windows-7-beta-on-vmware-server-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Outlook of VMware Server 2.0</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/new-outlook-of-vmware-server-20/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/new-outlook-of-vmware-server-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some of the screen shots to show the new outlook of the VMware Server 2.0. I will say that is easy to use and manage, and the respond from the web console is fast. VMware server is been offered for free always as it may be 1 of the choice for those users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some of the screen shots to show the new outlook of the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2.0. I will say that is easy to use and manage, and the respond from the web console is fast. VMware server is been offered for free always as it may be 1 of the choice for those users who want to get know of VMware products. You may want to use it for production purpose if your <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a> does not require advance features such as HA/DRS or <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmotion">VMotion</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-1.jpg" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-639];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-1.jpg" alt="null" width="70%" height="70%" /></a><br />
The New display of the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/web">web</a> console</p>
<p><span id="more-639"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-2.jpg" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-639];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-2.jpg" alt="null" width="70%" height="70%" /></a><br />
New <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/remote">Remote</a> Console which connect to the active <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/virtual">Virtual</a> Machine</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-3.jpg" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-639];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-3.jpg" alt="null" width="70%" height="70%" /></a><br />
Remote Console figure 2</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-4.jpg" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-639];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-4.jpg" alt="null" width="70%" height="70%" /></a><br />
Permission administration tab</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-15.jpg" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-639];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/vmserver2-15.jpg" alt="null" width="70%" height="70%" /></a><br />
New VM running on VMware Server 2.0</p>
<p>There are more to come on my next post to further elaborate about <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> Server 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/new-outlook-of-vmware-server-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Server 2 Vs VMware Workstation</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmwareserver2/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmwareserver2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX 3i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As VMware 2.0 is officially launched and final release since October 2008, here I would like share some preview related to the new VMware Server 2.0. VMware Server 2.0 is free and open source version, which is different with enterprise ESX 3i which also a free version from VMware. In term to utilize VMware server [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As VMware 2.0 is officially launched and final release since October <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/2008">2008</a>, here I would like share some preview related to the new VMware Server <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/2.0">2.0</a>.</p>
<p>VMware Server 2.0 is free and open source version, which is different with enterprise <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx3i">ESX 3i</a> which also a free version from VMware. In term to utilize VMware server 2.0, you will require to have a <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> or <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/linux">Linux</a> install on your machine or server, and install VMware Server 2.0 on top of the operating system to enable the hypervisor to be executed. This is different with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/3i">3i</a> which is not require any Operating System to be installed.</p>
<p>We may see this as a competitive product with VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a> 6.5 which recently launched. If you ask my opinion, I will say that both are on different product range. VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2 can be consider as alternative to the business users, who may not need the advance technology &amp; features to simplify their <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/it">IT</a> environment with minimal administration require. This product is more suitable for the Small Medium <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/enterprise">Enterprise</a> users which may not have a <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/dc">Data Center</a> for their working location. I will say that a Junior IT professional will easily able to manage the VMware Server and take the opportunity as a entry level for Enterprise Virtualization with VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2. Besides that, it does provide opportunity for every users to have <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/virtualization">virtualization</a> in place for their business to provide better <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/roi">ROI</a> in term of <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/hardware">hardware</a> investment and utilization.</p>
<p><span id="more-585"></span></p>
<p>If we look <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a>, it provide more features and ability to the IT pro users to perform their test and development environment on their laptop, workstation or desktop which reduce the amount of servers require for a corporate to perform their application development. Somehow, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> is targeting Enterprise level, 3i is provide for free which some cases we may not require <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmotion">VMotion</a> and <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/ha">HA</a> capability. Management wise, Workstation is simple and easy. You may not require to browse through the web console and easily can be launched as a program from your machine, but you will lost the administration features on the network. VMware Workstation has <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/ace">ACE</a> integrated, drag and drop features and etc, which may not require for most of the VMware Server users for hosting purpose. VMware Server 2 will require a web browser for your management, and you able to manage it through <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/lan">LAN</a> network. There is a tomcat installed while you configure you VMware server at the 1st time.</p>
<p>In VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2, I had seen there are a lot of new features and improvement and I am impress with the respond time of the web browser. There is absolutely no delay within the respond over the web browser which is easy to be used and managed. It contain most features we require and useable today and improvement of performance and manage ability. Again, this is a free version, as if I compare this to the free version of <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/hypervisor">hypervisor</a> from <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xen">XEN</a>, I will prefer to proceed with VMware Server 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmwareserver2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netware 6.5 on VMware</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/netware-65-on-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/netware-65-on-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had recently setup a development environment to verify the potential of migrating the existing age servers which running with Netware 6.5 from physical to virtual. The reason of doing this is purely due to the expiration of our server life cycle, and potential to reduce the capex requirement for replacing with new servers. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had recently setup a development environment to verify the potential of migrating the existing age servers which running with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netware">Netware</a> 6.5 from physical to virtual. The reason of doing this is purely due to the expiration of our server life cycle, and potential to reduce the capex requirement for replacing with new servers. As we know that the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/novell">Novell</a> Netware 6.5 will not able to utilize the quad cores processing power which is consider a common servers resources today.</p>
<p>I had tried to setup the VM for Netware 6.5 on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> ESX 3.5, VMware Server 2.0 and VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a> 6.5, and it was surprised myself that the workstation edition, I can easily provide 2 Vcpu for a single VM which run the Netware 6.5, which <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> 3.5 and VMware Server 2.0 is refused by default. I went for some google search and technical research, it show that the Netware will not require to have 2 Vcpu in most cases, even if you need to do so, you have to know the back door to overcome this.</p>
<p><span id="more-565"></span></p>
<p>To force 2 <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu">Vcpu</a> per VM, you will require to log in through the web console on the ESX host, and power off the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a>. Edit the Vcpu numbers from 1 to 2 or 4. My test result, 2 might be the better option on ESX. Power up your VM now, you should able to see the 2 Vcpu on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netware">Netware</a> 6.5 which run on ESX 3.5. Weird thing happen now, you will notice that the CPU utilization is very high and consistently over 50% even with fresh install Netware 6.5. When you do a monitor command from netware, you will only see the 5% utilization from the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu">CPU</a>. I am sure there is bugs from VMware regarding this.</p>
<p>Now we go to VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2.0, you need to export the image from <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> 3.5 to VMware Server, and power it up. Please do not modify the number of cpu per vm on the webconsole, as it is not allow to be run more than 1Vcpu for <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netware">Netware</a> 6.5 on vmware server by default. In this case, the CPU utilization on VMware server is much more acceptable which only 30% utilize.</p>
<p>Due to a low demand on Netware today, I believe it is the reason of VMware is not investing too much time of fixing the netware issues. But again, I believe it  is sufficient to host the netware server on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> as it will not require the extra resources as we normally have on any server today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/netware-65-on-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.478 seconds -->

