<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; VMware Workstation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware-workstation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Workstation conflict with Virtual PC in Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-workstation-conflict-with-virtual-pc-in-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-workstation-conflict-with-virtual-pc-in-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft had included the virtual PC with backward compatible of Windows XP to support the users who may had difficult to run their application on Windows 7. This is free and we can see more user will sure include this as part of the Windows 7 installation move forward. Bear in mind, if you have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft had included the virtual PC with backward compatible of Windows XP to support the users who may had difficult to run their application on Windows 7. This is free and we can see more user will sure include this as part of the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows7">Windows 7</a> installation move forward. Bear in mind, if you have VMware Workstation running on the same machine, you may see the conflict happen if you have your Virtual PC application running and you try to start up a virtual machine from VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a>. There will be a message prompt to inform you that there are existing hypervisor utilize the virtualization capabilities on your machine. The only way to get your VM start up is to end the session of your <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/virtualpc">Virtual PC</a> application. You should able to start your virtual machine up. Not very sure whether there are any workaround beside this, but at this moment, it consider a conflict and we need to choose either 1 to be run at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-workstation-conflict-with-virtual-pc-in-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running ESX in Fusion</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/running-esx-in-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/running-esx-in-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ratatouille</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX 3.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a 1st time Mac user I am truly impress with the performance &#38; capability. I was a true PC users with windows &#38; started to use Linux quite a bit for passed 2-3 years. Recently with anonymous tips from someone I was able to get ESX running inside VMware Fusion Version 2.0.1 (128865). Just create a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a 1st time <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/mac">Mac</a> user I am truly impress with the performance &amp; capability. I was a true PC users with windows &amp; started to use <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/linux">Linux</a> quite a bit for passed 2-3 years.</p>
<p>Recently with anonymous tips from someone I was able to get ESX running inside VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/fusion">Fusion</a> Version 2.0.1 (128865).</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Fusion-ESX.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-782];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Fusion-ESX.png" alt="ESX in Fuion" width="517" height="262" rel="shadowbox" /></a><br />
Just create a VM as per normal wizard &amp; select &#8220;Generic Linux&#8221; or &#8220;RedHat Linux&#8221; works well for me.<br />
<span id="more-782"></span><br />
In order to get a guest <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a> power up inside <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> running on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/fusion">Fusion</a> you will need the following setting inside the .vmx configuration:-</p>
<p><em>ethernet0.virtualDev = &#8220;e1000&#8243;</em></p>
<p><em>monitor.virtual_exec = &#8220;hardware&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>monitor_control.restrict_backdoor = &#8220;true&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Once installed you can just connect with the standard VI client as per normal. ESX will detect all the BIOS &amp; hardware config as well.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Fusion-VI.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-782];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Fusion-VI.png" alt="Hardare Info" rel="shadowbox" /></a></p>
<p>The above .vmx config will work with VMware Workstation from v6.x onwards.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/VM-pwr.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-782];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/VM-pwr.png" alt="Virtual Machines" width="509" height="177" rel="shadowbox" /></a></p>
<p>As I was conducting some testing which required quite a number of VMs. I was able to have the following running in a single MacBook Pro:-</p>
<p>2 * 768Mb RAM <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> 2003 RC2<br />
1 * 1.3Gb RAM ESX 3.5 U3<br />
1 * 512Mb RAM Ubuntu 64bit<br />
1 * 256Mb RAM Knoppix</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Fusion-Guest.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-782];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Fusion-Guest.png" alt="VM Guest" rel="shadowbox" /></a><br />
<em></em><br />
As follow is hardware spec for my Mac</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Mac-cfg.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-782];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/images/Mac-cfg.png" alt="Mac hardware spec" width="509" height="274" rel="shadowbox" /></a></p>
<p>This beast is really value for $$$. I am sure I can&#8217;t run that many VMs in a M$ environment with the same hardware spec.  As why I need to have so many VMs running will continue the series next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/running-esx-in-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Beta on VMware Server 2</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/windows-7-beta-on-vmware-server-2/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/windows-7-beta-on-vmware-server-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windos 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I had fully tested the installation and functionalities for the latest Windows 7 on my VMware Server 2.0. The OS choice I choose from the VMware Server is Vista as for compatible to run the Windows 7. Impressively the performance is much more better than the Vista before. The installation had went through as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I had fully tested the installation and functionalities for the latest Windows 7 on my VMware Server 2.0. The OS choice I choose from the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> Server is <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vista">Vista</a> as for compatible to run the Windows 7. Impressively the performance is much more better than the Vista before. The installation had went through as usual as I do not run into drivers issues during and after the installation for Windows 7. Now I am enjoying the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows7">Windows 7</a> on VM with good performance compare to my Vista which always give me troublesome with unknown error.</p>
<p><span id="more-769"></span></p>
<p>The only difficulty I have now is Daemon Tools, which use for <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/iso">ISO</a> purpose. Beside that, I am using it as my day to day operational purpose including Microsoft <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/office">Office</a>, firefox, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/ie">IE</a> 8, Live messenger and etc. Respond wise had been significant improve as compare to Vista previously.</p>
<p>I am not installed my Workstation to <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows7">Windows 7</a> 64 bits Ultimate version and use in full mode for my office work. I would like to say I am happy on it. If you want to have a try on this, you will always able to install the windows 7 on both VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a> and VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a>. Have fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/windows-7-beta-on-vmware-server-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Turn Off Beep Speaker Sound</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/how-to-turn-off-beep-speaker-sound/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/how-to-turn-off-beep-speaker-sound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jlchannel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HowsTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Beep&#8230; beeep&#8230; beeeep&#8230;&#8221; such an annoying sound that always happen in VMware Workstation(I&#8217;m currently running 6.5.1) Linux and Windows guests machine. I would like to share How to disable or turn off beep speaker sound on VMware Workstation. Look for virtual machine DOT VMX(.vmx) file. Edit virtual machine .vmx file. Insert &#8220;mks.noBeep = “TRUE”&#8221; Save [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Beep&#8230; beeep&#8230; beeeep&#8230;&#8221; such an annoying sound that always happen in VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a>(I&#8217;m currently running 6.5.1) <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/linux">Linux</a> and <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> guests machine.</p>
<p>I would like to share <strong>How to disable or turn off beep speaker sound</strong> on VMware Workstation.</p>
<ol>
<li>Look for virtual machine DOT VMX(.vmx) file.</li>
<li>Edit virtual machine .vmx file.</li>
<li>Insert</li>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><em>&#8220;mks.noBeep = “TRUE”&#8221;</em></strong></span></p>
<li>Save .vmx file.</li>
<li>Power On virtual machine.</li>
</ol>
<p><span id="more-757"></span></p>
<p>For an example, my <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/opensuse">OpenSuSe</a> 11 DOT VMX file save in drive D:\My VM\OpenSUSE11\ folder as show below.<br />
<a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vmx.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-757];player=img;"><img src="http://www.malaysiavm.com/images/vmx.png" alt="VMX" /></a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/how-to-turn-off-beep-speaker-sound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Server 2 Vs VMware Workstation</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmwareserver2/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmwareserver2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX 3i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As VMware 2.0 is officially launched and final release since October 2008, here I would like share some preview related to the new VMware Server 2.0. VMware Server 2.0 is free and open source version, which is different with enterprise ESX 3i which also a free version from VMware. In term to utilize VMware server [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As VMware 2.0 is officially launched and final release since October <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/2008">2008</a>, here I would like share some preview related to the new VMware Server <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/2.0">2.0</a>.</p>
<p>VMware Server 2.0 is free and open source version, which is different with enterprise <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx3i">ESX 3i</a> which also a free version from VMware. In term to utilize VMware server 2.0, you will require to have a <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> or <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/linux">Linux</a> install on your machine or server, and install VMware Server 2.0 on top of the operating system to enable the hypervisor to be executed. This is different with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/3i">3i</a> which is not require any Operating System to be installed.</p>
<p>We may see this as a competitive product with VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a> 6.5 which recently launched. If you ask my opinion, I will say that both are on different product range. VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2 can be consider as alternative to the business users, who may not need the advance technology &amp; features to simplify their <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/it">IT</a> environment with minimal administration require. This product is more suitable for the Small Medium <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/enterprise">Enterprise</a> users which may not have a <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/dc">Data Center</a> for their working location. I will say that a Junior IT professional will easily able to manage the VMware Server and take the opportunity as a entry level for Enterprise Virtualization with VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2. Besides that, it does provide opportunity for every users to have <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/virtualization">virtualization</a> in place for their business to provide better <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/roi">ROI</a> in term of <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/hardware">hardware</a> investment and utilization.</p>
<p><span id="more-585"></span></p>
<p>If we look <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a>, it provide more features and ability to the IT pro users to perform their test and development environment on their laptop, workstation or desktop which reduce the amount of servers require for a corporate to perform their application development. Somehow, <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> is targeting Enterprise level, 3i is provide for free which some cases we may not require <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmotion">VMotion</a> and <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/ha">HA</a> capability. Management wise, Workstation is simple and easy. You may not require to browse through the web console and easily can be launched as a program from your machine, but you will lost the administration features on the network. VMware Workstation has <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/ace">ACE</a> integrated, drag and drop features and etc, which may not require for most of the VMware Server users for hosting purpose. VMware Server 2 will require a web browser for your management, and you able to manage it through <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/lan">LAN</a> network. There is a tomcat installed while you configure you VMware server at the 1st time.</p>
<p>In VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2, I had seen there are a lot of new features and improvement and I am impress with the respond time of the web browser. There is absolutely no delay within the respond over the web browser which is easy to be used and managed. It contain most features we require and useable today and improvement of performance and manage ability. Again, this is a free version, as if I compare this to the free version of <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/hypervisor">hypervisor</a> from <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/xen">XEN</a>, I will prefer to proceed with VMware Server 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmwareserver2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netware 6.5 on VMware</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/netware-65-on-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/netware-65-on-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had recently setup a development environment to verify the potential of migrating the existing age servers which running with Netware 6.5 from physical to virtual. The reason of doing this is purely due to the expiration of our server life cycle, and potential to reduce the capex requirement for replacing with new servers. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had recently setup a development environment to verify the potential of migrating the existing age servers which running with <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netware">Netware</a> 6.5 from physical to virtual. The reason of doing this is purely due to the expiration of our server life cycle, and potential to reduce the capex requirement for replacing with new servers. As we know that the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/novell">Novell</a> Netware 6.5 will not able to utilize the quad cores processing power which is consider a common servers resources today.</p>
<p>I had tried to setup the VM for Netware 6.5 on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> ESX 3.5, VMware Server 2.0 and VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">Workstation</a> 6.5, and it was surprised myself that the workstation edition, I can easily provide 2 Vcpu for a single VM which run the Netware 6.5, which <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> 3.5 and VMware Server 2.0 is refused by default. I went for some google search and technical research, it show that the Netware will not require to have 2 Vcpu in most cases, even if you need to do so, you have to know the back door to overcome this.</p>
<p><span id="more-565"></span></p>
<p>To force 2 <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcpu">Vcpu</a> per VM, you will require to log in through the web console on the ESX host, and power off the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vm">VM</a>. Edit the Vcpu numbers from 1 to 2 or 4. My test result, 2 might be the better option on ESX. Power up your VM now, you should able to see the 2 Vcpu on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netware">Netware</a> 6.5 which run on ESX 3.5. Weird thing happen now, you will notice that the CPU utilization is very high and consistently over 50% even with fresh install Netware 6.5. When you do a monitor command from netware, you will only see the 5% utilization from the <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cpu">CPU</a>. I am sure there is bugs from VMware regarding this.</p>
<p>Now we go to VMware <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/server">Server</a> 2.0, you need to export the image from <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/esx">ESX</a> 3.5 to VMware Server, and power it up. Please do not modify the number of cpu per vm on the webconsole, as it is not allow to be run more than 1Vcpu for <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/netware">Netware</a> 6.5 on vmware server by default. In this case, the CPU utilization on VMware server is much more acceptable which only 30% utilize.</p>
<p>Due to a low demand on Netware today, I believe it is the reason of VMware is not investing too much time of fixing the netware issues. But again, I believe it  is sufficient to host the netware server on <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> as it will not require the extra resources as we normally have on any server today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/netware-65-on-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Workstation 6.5 RC1 Available for Download</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-workstation-65-beta-available-for-download/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-workstation-65-beta-available-for-download/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had just refreshed my VMware workstation 6.5 Beta today with the latest release from VMware. Here is the URL you can register and immediate getting the serial key and allow you to download the installation source for a try. More features had been include in 6.5 prior to VMware workstation 6.0 http://www.vmware.com/beta/ws65/registration.html Try it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had just refreshed my <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">workstation</a> 6.5 Beta today with the latest release from VMware.</p>
<p>Here is the URL you can register and immediate getting the serial key and allow you to download the installation source for a try. More features had been include in 6.5 prior to <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmware">VMware</a> <a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/workstation">workstation</a> 6.0</p>
<p><a href=" http://www.vmware.com/beta/ws65/registration.html"></p>
<p>http://www.vmware.com/beta/ws65/registration.html</a></p>
<p><span id="more-196"></span><br />
Try it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-workstation-65-beta-available-for-download/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.453 seconds -->

