<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malaysia VMware Communities &#187; vswitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vswitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bugs on ESX Host and vCenter for ESX 4.0 Update 2</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/bugs-on-esx-host-and-vcenter-for-esx-4-0-update-2/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/bugs-on-esx-host-and-vcenter-for-esx-4-0-update-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vswitch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=2238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I re-setup the VMware environment for my client. There was a weird problem we were facing on the port group from standard vswitch for VMkernel. Here is the step how I create it. Firstly, I created a new vSwitch, which is vSwitch 1 is this case, and I created 2 extra port group which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7430566020196385";
/* MVM Index Link Code 468x15, created 1/3/10 */
google_ad_slot = "5937837755";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 15;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p><p>Yesterday I re-setup the VMware environment for my client. There was a weird problem we were facing on the port group from standard vswitch for VMkernel. Here is the step how I create it.</p>
<p>Firstly, I created a new vSwitch, which is vSwitch 1 is this case, and I created 2 extra port group which is NFS1 and NFS2 at the same time with correct ip, subnet and etc. Once I done that, I click ok to apply the configuration. Funny thing happen now, the NFS1 created was working as I can mount the datastore as I need. NFS2 was giving problem which it suppose to point to different storage unit for NFS, it could not reach the storage unit. I try to perform vmkping on the ESX host, and it could not reach the storage host.</p>
<p><span id="more-2238"></span>After I troubleshoot for 30 mins, I decided to remove the NFS2 and re-create again. This round, it works. This happen to 2 of the ESX hosts we rebuilt, and I had confirmed this is the bug on the ESX 4.0 update 2. All the configuration is perform via vCenter GUI. For the additional 2 more host, I tend to create 1 VMkernel at 1 time, and this problem is gone. This bugs had cost us time to figure out, but it could harm your environment if both port group created are pointing to the same storage. You may want to recheck your redundancy configuration while you setup your environment in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/bugs-on-esx-host-and-vcenter-for-esx-4-0-update-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Process to disconnect ESX host from vCenter with DVSwitch</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/process-to-disconnect-esx-host-from-vcenter-with-dvswitch/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/process-to-disconnect-esx-host-from-vcenter-with-dvswitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvswitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vswitch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It been quite some times I did not migrate the ESX host from 1 vCenter to another. For most of the deployment recently, we were either deploy our vSphere 4 with DVswitch or Nexus 1000V from Cisco. Here are some steps you may want to consider when you migrate the ESX host from 1 vCenter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It been quite some times I did not migrate the ESX host from 1 vCenter to another. For most of the deployment recently, we were either deploy our vSphere 4 with DVswitch or Nexus 1000V from Cisco. Here are some steps you may want to consider when you migrate the ESX host from 1 vCenter to another if you are using DVswitch. Usually we can disconnect the ESX host from vCenter and remove it from inventory, and reconnect to the new vCenter. If you are follow this way for standard vSwitch, it shouldn&#8217;t cause you any problem, but if you deploy this way for the environment which using DVswitch, the new vCenter will give you error  which shown the previous DVswitch record are still tie to the ESX host on a different vCenter. Do not get panic as the Network connectivity are still working as usual, but you will not able to connect the ESX host to the new DVSwitch.</p>
<p><span id="more-2051"></span>The proper way of doing this, you should consider to provision at least 1 physical connection back to the standard vswitch, and migrate all the management port and vmkernel port back to it from the existing DVSwitch. After that, you should disconnect the ESX host from the previous DVSwitch. Now you can remove the ESX host from the previous vCenter, and reconnect it to the new vCenter which you would like to migrate to. From here on wards, you should able to connect the ESX host to the new DVswitch you would like to after the ESX host presented to the new vCenter. Have fun!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/process-to-disconnect-esx-host-from-vcenter-with-dvswitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Nexus 5000 POC</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/cisco-nexus-5000-poc/</link>
		<comments>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/cisco-nexus-5000-poc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jlchannel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vswitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=1430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past one week have been busy with VMware vSphere 4 and Cisco Nexus 5000 POC and the result is really disappointed. Personally I couldn&#8217;t believed and I think I may missed out something. If anyone have any idea or suggestion, please feel free to comment here or post reply at slow Performance with 10 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past one week have been busy with VMware <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vSphere">vSphere</a> 4 and <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cisco">Cisco</a> <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/nexus">Nexus</a> 5000 POC and the result is really disappointed. Personally I couldn&#8217;t believed and I think I may missed out something. If anyone have any idea or suggestion, please feel free to comment here or post reply at <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/219227">slow Performance with 10 Gb CNA card on vSphere 4</a> thread.</p>
<p><strong>Benchmark Test Configuration</strong><br />
2 x VMware  vSphere 4 hosts<br />
2 x <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/dell">Dell</a> PE2950 Hardware<br />
 &#8211; Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU  E5410  @ 2.33GHz<br />
 &#8211; 16GB RAM<br />
 &#8211; <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/qlogic">Qlogic</a> QLE8042 10GbE Mercury Converged Network Adapter(<a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cna">CNA</a>) &#8211; connected to PCIe 8x slot</p>
<p><strong>Updated:</strong> PERC 6/i version. 6.2.0-0013 &#038; BOIS version. 2.6.1</p>
<p><span id="more-1430"></span><br />
<strong>VMware vSphere <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vcenter">vCenter</a></strong><br />
 &#8211; running as virtual machine<br />
 &#8211; 4vCPU<br />
 &#8211; 6GB RAM<br />
 &#8211; Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard edition </p>
<p>2 x Microsoft <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> Server 2003 Standard edition virtual machines<br />
 &#8211; 4vCPU<br />
 &#8211; 4GB RAM</p>
<p><strong>Software:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.netperf.org">Netperf</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/mtu">MTU</a> 9000 setup</strong><br />
VMware vSphere host<br />
esxcfg-vswitch -m 9000 vSwitch2</p>
<p>Windows Server 2003 standard edition virtual machine<br />
Device Manager -> Network Adapters -> <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vmxnet">VMXNET</a>3 Ethernet Adapter -> Properties -> Advanced -> Jumbo Packet -> Jumbo 9000 and Speed / Duplex -> 10Gbps Full Duplex</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/cisco">Cisco</a> Nexus 5000K &#8211; Enable MTU 9000 and <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/jumboframe">Jumbo Frame</a></p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/nexus5k.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/nexus5k.png" width="504" height="278" alt="Cisco Nexus 5000 and vSphere 4 POC" /></a></p>
<p>VMware vSphere hosts<br />
name: esx05<br />
name: esx06</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/windows">Windows</a> Server 2003 standard edition virtual machine<br />
name: test1 (running on esx06)<br />
name: test2 (running on esx05)</p>
<p>Virtual <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/vswitch">Switch</a><br />
Port Group name &#8211; test262 (Connected with single vNICs detected as <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/Intel">Intel</a> 82598EB 10 Gigabit AF Dual Port Network) with VLAN ID 1.</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/n5k-vswitch.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/n5k-vswitch.png" width="509" height="315"  alt="VMware vSwitch" /></a></p>
<p>Note: vSphere auto detect as ISP8432 4Gb FCoE PCI Express HBA &#038; Intel 82598EB 10 Gigabit </p>
<p>And the <a href="http://www.malaysiavm.com/blog/tag/result">result</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/netperf-result.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/netperf-result.png" width="512" height="303" alt="netperf result" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/n5k-copyfiles.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/n5k-copyfiles.png" width="515" height="218" alt="Copying Files between 2 VMs sitting on different ESX host" /></a><br />
click to enlarge.</p>
<p><strong>Updated: 10 July 2009</strong><br />
CNA connected back to back on 2 VMware vSphere servers.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/netperf_linux_b2b.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/netperf_linux_b2b.png" width="508" height="428" alt="Netperf on Linux back to back " /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/netperf_windows_b2b.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/netperf_windows_b2b.png" width="506" height="367" alt="Netperf on Windows back to back connect" /></a></p>
<p>Probably you may refer to VMware documentation as link below:<br />
- <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/10GigE_performance.pdf">10GugE Performance</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx_network_planning.pdf">ESX Networking Planning</a></p>
<p>Another tricky part is, I&#8217;m managed to get total of<strong> 6G out of 10G</strong> if I running 10 VMs instances with <em>8192 Message Size and 163840 Socket Size</em> as suggested in documentation as above. Again, single netperf session will get about 2.7G for Linux and 1.5G for Windows either Nexus 5K nor back to back connection. And you may get better result with 1 CPU compare to 4 CPUs or 8 CPUs which I believed a limitation on netperf itself.</p>
<p><strong>Updated: 27 July 2009</strong></p>
<p>Windows 2008 Standard Edition with 1vCPU, E1000 vNIC and 5G single file transfer.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8_E1000_5GFile_Transfer_Test_01.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8_E1000_5GFile_Transfer_Test_01.png" width="512" height="307" alt="Win2K8 Server Standard Edition E1000 vNIC 5G file Transfer" /></a></p>
<p>Windows 2008 Standard Edition with 1vCPU, E1000 vNIC and netperf.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8_E1000_netperf.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8_E1000_netperf.png" width="512" height="307" alt="Window Server 2008 Standard Edition E1000 vNIC Netperf" /></a></p>
<p>Windows 2008 Standard Edition with 1vCPU, VMXNET3 vNIC, Internet Download Manager HTTP multiple sessions download.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/IDM_5Gfile_download.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/IDM_5Gfile_download.png" width="512" height="307" alt="IDM HTTP 5G file Download" /></a></p>
<p>Windows 2008 Data Center Edition with 1vCPU, VMXNET3 vNIC, 5G single file transfer.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8DC_1vcpu_VMXNET3_5GFile_Transfer_Test_01.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8DC_1vcpu_VMXNET3_5GFile_Transfer_Test_01.png" width="512" height="307" alt="Windows Server 2008 Data Center Edition 1vCPU VMXNET3 5G file transfer " /></a></p>
<p>Windows 2008 Data Center Edition with 8vCPU, VMXNET3 vNIC, 5G single file transfer with default TCP setup.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8DC_8vcpu_VMXNET3_5GFile_Transfer_Test_01.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8DC_8vcpu_VMXNET3_5GFile_Transfer_Test_01.png" width="512" height="307" alt="Windows Server 2008 Data Center Edition 8vCPU VMXNET3 5G Single file tranfer" /></a></p>
<p>Windows 2008 Data Center Edition with 8vCPU, VMXNET3 vNIC, 5G single file transfer with TCP tuning enabled.<br />
<a href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8DC_8vcpu_VMXNET3__autotuninglevel_exp_5GFile_Transfer_Test_02.png" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1430];player=img;"><img src="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Win2k8DC_8vcpu_VMXNET3__autotuninglevel_exp_5GFile_Transfer_Test_02.png" width="512" height="307" alt="Windows Server 2008 Data Center Edition 8vCPU VMXNET3 TCP tuning enable 5G single file transfer" /></a></p>
<p>Summary:<br />
The result are not consistent and I believed they may have some limitation on VMware or Microsoft Windows Operating System or Qlogic CNA card driver. </p>
<p><strong>Updated:</strong><br />
Thanks to Maurizio &#038; Craig comments. I&#8217;m fully agreed with you guys that the Cisco Nexus 5000 is not the bottleneck but other factors.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/cisco-nexus-5000-poc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.360 seconds -->

