<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware VMFS Vs RDM ( Raw Device Mapping )</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=23#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>it depend how many local drives you have. At the end of the day, the performance are very subjective to the numbers of Disk, raid group configuration and etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it depend how many local drives you have. At the end of the day, the performance are very subjective to the numbers of Disk, raid group configuration and etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 16:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=23#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>So, if we are not using SAN but local disk, has sense to make mv with RDM hard disk instead VDMK if we are finding more performance?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if we are not using SAN but local disk, has sense to make mv with RDM hard disk instead VDMK if we are finding more performance?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best sizing for single Storage LUN &#124; Malaysia VMware Communities</title>
		<link>http://malaysiavm.com/blog/vmware-vmfs-vs-rdm-raw-device-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Best sizing for single Storage LUN &#124; Malaysia VMware Communities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malaysiavm.com/blog/?p=23#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] are looking for performance as well. Normally we assign a RAW Device for that, you can connect a RAW up to maximum 2TB disk space if required. Check VMware VMFS vs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are looking for performance as well. Normally we assign a RAW Device for that, you can connect a RAW up to maximum 2TB disk space if required. Check VMware VMFS vs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.303 seconds -->

