VMware Server 2 Vs VMware Workstation
Posted by craig 
- on November 17th, 2008 in Industry News, Virtualization | 3 Comments »
As VMware 2.0 is officially launched and final release since October 2008, here I would like share some preview related to the new VMware Server 2.0.
VMware Server 2.0 is free and open source version, which is different with enterprise ESX 3i which also a free version from VMware. In term to utilize VMware server 2.0, you will require to have a Windows or Linux install on your machine or server, and install VMware Server 2.0 on top of the operating system to enable the hypervisor to be executed. This is different with ESX 3i which is not require any Operating System to be installed.
We may see this as a competitive product with VMware Workstation 6.5 which recently launched. If you ask my opinion, I will say that both are on different product range. VMware Server 2 can be consider as alternative to the business users, who may not need the advance technology & features to simplify their IT environment with minimal administration require. This product is more suitable for the Small Medium Enterprise users which may not have a Data Center for their working location. I will say that a Junior IT professional will easily able to manage the VMware Server and take the opportunity as a entry level for Enterprise Virtualization with VMware Server 2. Besides that, it does provide opportunity for every users to have virtualization in place for their business to provide better ROI in term of hardware investment and utilization.
If we look VMware Workstation, it provide more features and ability to the IT pro users to perform their test and development environment on their laptop, workstation or desktop which reduce the amount of servers require for a corporate to perform their application development. Somehow, ESX is targeting Enterprise level, 3i is provide for free which some cases we may not require VMotion and HA capability. Management wise, Workstation is simple and easy. You may not require to browse through the web console and easily can be launched as a program from your machine, but you will lost the administration features on the network. VMware Workstation has ACE integrated, drag and drop features and etc, which may not require for most of the VMware Server users for hosting purpose. VMware Server 2 will require a web browser for your management, and you able to manage it through LAN network. There is a tomcat installed while you configure you VMware server at the 1st time.
In VMware Server 2, I had seen there are a lot of new features and improvement and I am impress with the respond time of the web browser. There is absolutely no delay within the respond over the web browser which is easy to be used and managed. It contain most features we require and useable today and improvement of performance and manage ability. Again, this is a free version, as if I compare this to the free version of hypervisor from XEN, I will prefer to proceed with VMware Server 2.
Related posts:
Tags: ESX, ESX 3i, Hypervisor, Virtualization, VMware, VMware Server, VMware Server 2, VMware Workstation, Xen
3 Responses
VMware Server 2 is not open source. Its Proprietary, Freeware – http://bit.ly/SoFK
HI Max, agree with you, I had use a wrong term, is Freeware instead of open source.
VMware Workstation is intended for “desktop use”, for a user who creates and edits Virtual Machines and uses them on his/hers desktop. It has features useful for product development that no other VMware product has such as integration with Visual Studio/Eclipse or VM teams, where the network between virtual machines in the team can be specified, including bandwidth and packet loss. VMware Workstation usually gets the new virtual hardware releases first and supports the widest guest OS range. It is optimized for interactive use and has some Direct3D capabilities (DirectX 8.1, directX 9 is in the works and is present in Workstation 6.5). Workstation supports multiple snapshots.
VMware Workstation needs to be installed on a host with a graphical system and runs your virtual machines inside the application, while on VMware Server the virtual machines run in the background as a service and the host don’t need a graphical interface installed.
VMware Server is meant for running server-like workloads. This means that the interactive desktop performance is not as good as workstation since the GUI is talking over the network in Server, while it’s talking locally in workstation. VMware Server supports a single snapshot.